Sure, we all want new computers, but sometimes, the money simply isn't there. If you have an old computer that freezes frequently, you have probably said to yourself, "this thing needs to go." So, ask for a new one. demand a new one, but whether you get a new one or not, keep the old one too. Give it a second life with Peppermint.
At the school where I work, I kept hearing teachers say things like, "my school computer is so slow, we can't even use it anymore." With no money in the budget for new computers, I began looking for ways to solve this problem. I came across Peppermint, a lightweight Linux operating system that breathes new life into old computers. Peppermint is designed for users who want easy access to web-based applications, which means it's Flash and Java ready out of the box.
I first installed Peppermint on a school computer that was practically left for dead. It's an old Dell with a Celeron processor and 756 MB RAM. It had Windows XP on it. Before I got rid of Windows (always a happy moment), I checked the system monitor (or whatever it's called in Windows). At idle, XP was using 500 to 600 MB of RAM, leaving only 150 to 250 MB for additional processes; it's no wonder this computer kept freezing. With Peppermint installed, this same computer would idle using less than 100 MB of RAM, leaving 650 MB to run the applications students need to use.
Now, I know what you're thinking: "If the OS only takes 100 MB to run, it can't be very functional." Wrong. First of all, Windows XP is about eight years old now; it doesn't look so hot anymore. Peppermint is new, and while it leaves out some of the nonessential visual effects included in the most powerful operating systems of today, it does not sacrifice functionality. Peppermint is based on Lubuntu, a lightweight version of Ubuntu (the most popular desktop Linux distribution); as such, you have access to about 25,000 applications from the Software Manager.
Peppermint is fast and easy to use. Whether you're stuck with an old computer that just won't move or you are looking for an operating system that is geared to web applications, you should give Peppermint a try. Why not? It's Linux, it's free.
I was going to do my podcast on Peppermint Ice, a lightweight Ubuntu-based Linux operating system that emphasizes web applications. That was before I learned of Jolicloud. According to Distrowatch, a new version of Jolicloud just came out last week; that's how I heard about it. Naturally, I had to try it. I first installed in a virtual machine, tried it out, and then decided to install it on my netbook. It's excellent for netbooks. Check out my podcast about it (I decided not to embed the video - it was too small).
The authors are exactly right when they argue professional development must be done as a community of learners in order to be successful. I was excited to read this because I tried to form a technology committee at my school for this very reason. I know teachers (and all workers) are more likely to change the way they do things if they are working together. The trouble is finding the time.
Teachers are often busy just keeping up with planning and assessing, forget about learning new ways of teaching. At my school, many teachers where multiple hats, and exactly half of the teachers are also currently pursing Master degrees. This does not mean it is impossible, but teachers need strong administrative support in order to embark on this endeavor. With little time and effort to spare, teachers need their leaders to make technology integration a priority.
I went to a two-day technology workshop in November. I was the only teacher from my school in attendance, and many of the teachers around me were completely lost. One teacher seemed to be using a web browser for the first time. The workshop meanwhile was essentially presentation of a smattering of web 2.0 tools. This was fine with me. About half of the tools were new to me, and about half of those seemed useful. I am already quite comfortable using technology so I did not have a hard time embracing these new tools, but I think most teachers need more, and even those of of who are able to easily use computers still need help bringing these tools into our classrooms.
I think the ideal situation would be to have technological integration staff at the school and a committee of teachers to lead the rest of the school bringing more technology into learning and instruction. Schools need staff with the expertise and time to help other teachers implement this new way of learning. Obviously, there are often fiscal obstacles to such an approach and it may be prudent to share technology support staff among different schools. Each school will have a different solution, but avoiding or ignoring the issue is a huge mistake, one our students cannot afford for us to make.
The section of this chapter that especially struck was the one about uses of technology in Special Education. I have never worked with any students with the sorts of physical impairments that would require the adaptations they discuss in this section, but I have worked with plenty of students with learning disabilities and I'm interested finding ways that technology can assist them (and me). That said, I also have some reservations about the long-term usefulness of some of the adaptations made for students with learning disabilities.
I have a student right now who can read, but not well. Her biggest problem is she cannot (or will not) focus. Most of the time she refuses to read, but does not want to listen to explanations or discuss the topics. The subject is Economics, which even I do not find all that interesting. I have been searching for games and interactive resources for teaching economics but everything I find is either intended for grade school or is too advanced. I have considered trying to make my own content, using audio and maybe some combination of homemade videos and voki to explain the content and present questions, but this would be a lot of work for me.
Besides the time that such and endeavor would take for me, I also have to ask myself what the student is taking away from such an experience. It's great if she could actually learn about Economics, but wouldn't it be more beneficial for her to learn how to obtain information on her own. She isn't going to have someone to spend hours modifying sources of information into her preferred medium all the time. She needs to be able to read and listen.
A third option which I'm sure many of you have already considered is having her create the content. The trouble there is that she needs to obtain the information first in order to do so. Sure, an interesting project might motivate her and this probably is how I will try to get her to do at least a little reading, but I have tried this approach in the past and had little success. Often, when I try to get my students to create anything, they lack the motivation and focus to accomplish anything.
I have strayed slightly from the main topic. Technology can provide valuable accommodations learners with special needs, but it should not replace more traditional ways of doing things. Students need to be able to listen to other people in order to perform well in the workplace. They need to be able to read in order to take control of their own learning. Otherwise, they will only have access to the limited content in other forms of media, which is extensive for sure, but will never surpass written expression.
As the authors say, it is hard to talk about the internet without talking about Google. For better or worse (and probably a combination of the two) Google has had a profound impact on the internet. For my part I tend to be pleased with most things Google has to offer, and while there are some changes I would like to see, it is tremendous that Google continues to provide such a wealth of free services to everyone.
The biggest complaint I have heard from people about Google is the accusation that Google sells page ranks. While it is understandable that people would be upset about this, the accusation is completely erroneous. Google does sell advertisements, but they are clearly labeled as such. The trouble, I believe, is the Google search process, while quite effective, is not easy to understand. The video below is Google's explanation of how it works.
I use a lot of Google products for personal use and with my students. Here are my favorites. Gmail is essential. It is secure, reliable, and easy to use. I have two accounts (one for personal use and one I use with my students). I use Google Calendar religiously, and I have tried to get my co-workers to use it too. We have shared calendars at work but there are many staff who still prefer to use one big paper calendar in the main office, which isn't very useful unless your in the main office. I use Google Docs with my students for a number of reasons. Originally, it was out of necessity. The computers at my school freeze often, and students lose their work. MS Office became especially problematic. Because Google Docs saves automatically and students can access their files without have to log on their account on the server (we also have issues with our server), it became a wonderful solution.
My most recent complaint about Google is related to the image search. It seems there is no way to be certain offensive images will not appear in an image search. This is especially troubling for teachers in Elementary schools. It would be nice if Google offered a kid-friendly image search. Even "Strict Safe-Search" doesn't cut it. Nonetheless, Google is indispensable in the classroom.
I am trying to get my principal to embrace Google Apps, and to use it to replace our current email server. Why pay for lousy email service when you can get it free from Google?
Back in January, I wrote about why I switched to Linux. Now, I want to share with you a list of reasons, why I believe educators especially should try Linux. I'm not going to try to convince you to abandon Windows or Mac; I actually think it's good to be proficient in more than one operating system. Speaking of operating systems, I need to clarify what Linux is. Linux is not an operating system. It is a kernel (think of it as the core of an operating system); there are many operating systems that use the Linux kernel. These are often called distributions or distros. For the purpose of this post, I will use the term Linux to refer to the whole body of Linux distributions, and will specify when I am talking about the kernel itself.
Why Educators should try Linux (Distros)
In no particular order here is a list of reasons to try Linux if you are an educator:
Linux is open-source. It's built on the ideals of collaboration and connectivism. Developers make new distributions based on the distributions of others. For instance, I am using Linux Mint right now. This distro was based on another distro called Ubuntu, which is based on Debian. These distros are not made by the same company or organization. There is some collaboration between these groups, but the idea is that anyone can take the code of one distro and use it as a base for another. Talk about sharing knowledge and ideas. Imagine someone asking Bill Gates, "Hey, could I just take a look at the source-code for Windows 7. I want to make a better version." If you support collaboration and connectivism as an educator then you should embrace the spirit of Linux.
It's free. Schools are always looking for ways to do more and save money. Linux operating systems are completely free and many distros give you access to thousands of free programs (more about this later). You never have to pay to upgrade to latest version. You can download an operating system, burn a CD, and put it on your computers without ever having to worry about licenses.
Distros like Debian, Ubuntu, and Linux Mint offer the Software Manager. This is akin to Apple's App Store but everything is free and we're talking about full-featured computer applications. The Software Manager makes it easy to find new programs. This is especially good to new users who may not be familiar with the software offerings of Linux. The software is sorted into categories, including one for educational software.
Learning a new operating system is a great way to enhance your y(or your students') information technology literacy because it forces you to escape from memorized procedures you never really understood. You have to think about how to do something. The basic tasks for which most people use a computers are pretty easy to figure out with most Linux distros, but there are fundamental differences in the way things are done in Linux. I have been using a Macs for eight years and even though I only started using Linux a few months ago, I have already discovered several new tricks through learning Linux that I can use on my Mac too.
There is no risk in trying. You don't have to buy a new computer or install Linux over your existing operating system. In fact, you can try many disoutros without installing anything. Many distros will run from a "Live CD". It's just like running any other software from a CD except in most cases you must boot from the CD. When running from the CD, it will be slower than if you installed the OS but you will be able to check it out at least.
Many distros come with the ability to partition your hard drive using a graphical user interface. In other words, if you choose to install Linux, you can still keep Windows or Mac on your machine. I do this on my Macbook, which I'm using right now. When I turn on the computer, I choose whether I want to boot Mac Snow Leopard or Linux Mint 10. You can also run Linux in a virtual machine like Virtual Box as long as your hardware is sufficient.
There are several great "light-weight" distros for lower-spec computers. I have used a few different ones including Lubuntu, Peppermint OS, and Mint LXDE. These distros are great for older computers, you know the ones at your school that everyone says are too slow. Slap a light-weight Linux distro on there and you'll be amazed at what those machines can still do. These distros can be especially useful to schools that cannot afford to buy newer equipment. I converted a couple of our school computers to Peppermint, and now other teachers are asking, "can you do that to mine too?" These light-weight distros use less of your computer's resources, saving you RAM and processor speed to run the applications you need to use. You sacrifice a little eye-candy, but these are new operating systems, so they still look nicer than Windows XP.
If you are a Mac user then chances are you have run into the issue of not being able to run some particular program on you computer because it was only available for Windows. This problem actually keeps people from leaving Windows, but it's a self-fulfilling prophecy; software companies are only willing to produce versions of software for operating systems with the largest number of users. The same problem is true for Linux. There is no reason proprietary software cannot be made available for Linux in fact there is some proprietary software for Linux distros. There will be more when there are more users. Educators are in an especially good position to cause change in this area or to prevent it for that matter, because their software choices stick. Educators should prepare their students to use a variety of operating systems and should actively encourage companies to make their software available for Linux.
Students interested in software engineering should definitely be exposed to Linux. Not only is the Linux community strong, open, and very supportive, but student-developers can work with the code for other developer's programs. Programs like this would also spur more open-source development which could further benefit schools by contributing to the growing abundance of applications available for free.
Linux is fun. There are a lot of cool features in Ubuntu and Linux Mint. I am used to the visual features that Mac offers and when I first started using Linux, I figured I would never get anything comparable. As it turns out, there are more visual features available. Some are useful and really cool looking like the rotating cube, while others are just fun like wobbly windows.
When you need support using Windows or Mac, what do you do? Do you call a hotline? Do you PAY for support? When I'm using Linux and I need technical support, I usually start with a forum (most developer have a forum on their website). Other users will often help, and often I have even received help from the creators of the software. Talk about building your personal learning network.
What else are you going to do with all those vacations teachers get? Check out Linux. Embrace the open source movement.
Check out the distros below:
For computers with at least 1 GB of RAM and an ok proceossor check out Ubuntu or Linux Mint 10.
For computers with low specs (less than 756MB RAM): check out Peppermint Ice and Linux Mint 10 LXDE.
If you are using an old Mac like an iBook or an iMac. Try MintPPC or Lubuntu. Be prepared: this is not as easy as installing on more common architectures; the old Macs used PowerPC processors which are not commonly supported anymore. It's a bit easier to install Lubuntu (instructions for Mac install here), but in either case, you will need to follow the instructions carefully. You might also want to check out Debian.
Brian Crosby's presentation of his classroom was refreshing. A lot of the ideas we have explored this semester are exciting to me, but many seem so far out of reach. For instance, watching the video about the Project-Based Learning school in Minnesota was exciting. I have to admit I'm envious of the whole program. What an excellent way to learn! I wish I had gone to a high school like that, and I would love to be able to teach in that sort of environment, but the reality is I don't.
It is easy to get lost in a sea of possibilities when studying education, and that's not always a bad thing. Nonetheless, I have to focus on the ways I can improve my instruction for my current students in the school where I currently teach. Having said that, a curriculum based on students choosing projects is not going to happen anytime soon at my school, and frankly I have my doubts that it would work well with our student population. That's not to say our students cannot benefit from project-based learning, but most of them do not have the motivation or character to take responsibility for their learning. I see this frequently while teaching Wood Shop. I have very few students who are willing to own their work. Project-based learning at my school would have to be more teacher-driven, I believe, at least in most cases.
Brian's presentation was encouraging because I can actually see a lot of his ideas being possible for me to implement in my current situation. Granted, everything he did with his class must have required an extraordinary amount of planning. I seem to find myself struggling to keep up with planning as it is. Each semester I have taught, I have taken on another course I have never taught before. I like the change, but it's hard to come up with a semester worth of curriculum in the middle of the year. At the moment, finding the time to plan far enough ahead to complete a project like that one Brian presented seems unlikely, but summer will come eventually.
For this semester, I think I will find small ways in which to introduce project-based learning. I would like to do it with all of my students, but I might start with the more advanced students. Again, I think all students can gain equally from PBL, but I think I would have a very hard time getting most of my students to design their own projects and an equally hard time getting them to buy-in to any project I present to them.
Schools need to develop a balanced approach to content filtering. The school where I work currently blocks nothing. Students are technically free to access any content they wish. Of course, we have policies stating what content is acceptable, but as any teacher knows, it is not possible to see exactly what every student is doing at the same time. While this is certainly risky, it has it's advantages as well.
When I decide I want to try using a new Web 2.0 tool, I can do so without any red tape. I may have other obstacles such as antiquated equipment and insufficient internet speed, but at least I do not need to get permission to access the content I need. It is a shame that YouTube is blocked at many schools because it is an excellent source for teachers and students. Unfortunately, it also has a lot of inappropriate content and provides a potential distraction.
Students at my school are allowed (and often encouraged) to listen to music while engaging in independent activities. Some students find this helps them tune-out distractions in the classroom (I have a lot of students with ADHD). When using computers, a lot of my students will opt to listen to music on YouTube. Some students use playlists so they don't have to constantly pick their next song, but many of my students don't manage this privilege well. I constantly have to remind them that they are only allowed to LISTEN to the music, not watch the videos. The other problem I face with sites like YouTube is the drain they put on our limited bandwidth.
Besides YouTube, Facebook is often a distraction to my students. According to our school policy, it is forbidden, but realistically, students will use it if they can access it. One of my students is clever enough to use a Facebook iGoogle gadget, so it's not quite as obvious that he is on Facebook. This semester, I have my own classroom instead of a shared computer lab, and I have toyed with the idea of blocking Facebook on my computers. While I would like my students to learn to make the right choice and stay on task, I know it won't happen. Most of them go to this school because they are really good at making bad choices. On the other end of the spectrum, I have also been thinking that maybe I should embrace Facebook, and have my students create a World History page on Facebook. I am having a hard time imagining how I would get them to buy in to this project, and I am guessing many of my students would abuse this, using it as an excuse to chat with friends and such.
Blocking blogging and wikis is ridiculous. Students need to learn about collaborative tools. I understand students need to be protected, but they will need to learn how to protect themselves once they are adults, and schools can't teach that to them without being able to access Web 2.0 tools.
The one thing that I wish my school blocked is pornography. It is not as much of an issue as might be expected, but I have caught some students viewing obscene content. Last year, three students were caught (we only have about 30 students in the school so that is actually a lot), but this year no one has been caught viewing pornography. That, of course, does not mean it hasn't happened. If I can figure out how to block obscene content on my classroom computers I will, but I'm not willing to give up access to Web 2.0 tools with educational value.
The implications of Connectivist theory are profound for today's teachers because they require a complete rethinking of learning objectives. Whereas Constructivism supports the prospect of planning a relatively linear path to the acquisition of some specified knowledge, Connectivists build webs of learning avenues with unforeseen outcomes.
To some educators, the connectivist approach will appear messy and not conducive to meeting state standards. I can imagine both new and seasoned teachers asking, "How can I teach the required content while my students are busy finding resources to build their 'personal learning networks'?" Of course, this question assumes that the required content is completely necessary.
Yes, it is important to have some content standards, but just how rigid should those standards be? How many American students remember who the Sumerians or Assyrians were? Both groups are typically part of a High School World History curriculum, and probably should be; their contributions to humanity are tremendous. Nonetheless, memorizing that Sumerians invented writing (cuneiform) over 5000 years ago is not as useful as being able to navigate the immense sea of information available to ordinary people in the 21st century.
Educators and policy-makers need to realize the most important learning leads to future learning. The connectivist teacher knows that a lifetime of learning is dependent upon building a personal learning network. Left to their own devices, some students might build supportive, informative networks that continue to grow and open their minds year after year. On the other hand, without assistance, many students may never discover how to build their learning networks and will be trapped within the confines of their innate circumstances. Worse yet, without guidance, some students may stumble unwittingly into a network of ill-doers. Today's world is one in which information is easily disseminated, and those with good intentions do not monopolize the internet. Students need information education more than ever.
When educators are concerned about teaching content, they can easily forget about teaching students. The content should not be the objective; it should be the vehicle. The learning objectives should always pertain to the student's development as a learner. Teachers must introduce content that provokes new thinking and inspires further exploration, because when students learn to think and explore, they can find any content they need. Memorization is nowhere near as important as it used to be. Open a web browser on your computer, or take your phone out of pocket. Type "invent writing" in a Google search, and you'll see why memorizing who the Sumerians were just isn't that essential. What is essential is knowing how to find, evaluate, and create information and media, and hopefully possessing a desire to do so.
If you have never used an air compressor, you are missing out. This highly customizable tool is indispensable in any shop. How does it work? The motor on the compressor draws air into a tank, squeezing more air into the tank than would naturally fit under normal circumstances. This pressurized air is then used to provide power to a wide variety of tools. In auto shops, you will hear mechanics tightening bolts with air impact wrenches. Carpenters use nail guns power by air compressors. Of course, you fill your tires with air from an air compressor, and someday you may even drive a car that is powered by compressed air. These are all wonderful uses of a very powerful tool.
In my wood shop class, my students' favorite pneumatic extension is the blow gun. This is an attachment that simply allows you to blow compressed air from a hose. It's handy for getting dust out of tight spaces or out of your hair. Many of my students think it also makes a great dust brush and broom. Why sweep when you can just blow dust all over the place? Well, unfortunately, this method is noisy, fills your lungs with dust, and after you leave the shop, all of the dust in the air just settles back down and nothing is any cleaner.
Cool tools are hard to hide. Everybody wants to use them whether they are helpful or simply a distraction. This is normal. People like to play.
Like air compressor, computers are incredibly versatile tools, and they should be widely used in education. However, they should not be used just for the sake of using technology. If the practice does not add value to learning than it is not a practice worth having in school. Technology without an educational purpose is not only a waste of precious time in school, it can also be rather boring.
I teach a high school ICT class, and I constantly struggle to find good reasons for my students to use new tools. Because there is no required academic content to the course, I try to incorporate as much as I can from various disciplines and life in general. I can't get my students to buy into “making a website because I need to make a website for class”. There has to be a reason for making the website.
This is actually one of the reasons I have advocated getting laptops at my school and incorporating more technology into the general curriculum. There are more opportunities to use technology for authentic reasons in general academia versus learning different tools in Computer Class that will never be used anywhere else because the rest of education is done with paper and pencils.
Whether the teacher's objective is to meet the state standards or to give the students a more engaging learning experience, computers can be very useful, but student engagement is more than just doing something. Engagement means being engrossed in the tasks of learning. Teachers who are eager to use more technology will struggle to use it appropriately. They are learning too. This does not mean they should avoid using computers in their classrooms. It simply means they need to go slowly and reflect about what works. Teachers and students should always ask, “did that activity make learning easier or better?” Then they need to determine why and how. In this way, educational communities can determine what is valuable and what is really just a waste of required seat time.
If, when you read the title of this post, you thought, "what is Linux?" then you are not alone. Many computer users believe that Windows and Mac are the only options for operating systems. In fact, there are many options, and some are more popular than you may realize. Linux operating systems are most prominent in the server market. In fact, over 85% of the world's top 500 supercomputers run on Linux. If you use the Internet, you undoubtedly access information from Linux servers all the time. Google, Amazon, Wikipedia, and several other Internet giants all use Linux for their servers because of its security. Even the U.S. Defense Department and FAA use Linux (Focus.com). Linux, however is not yet popular for the average computer user, but its use is growing.
I recently jumped into the Linux community and I am very excited about what I have found. What follows is an explanation of why I switched to Linux.
Besides a Commodore 64 my parents had when I was too young to remember, the first computer in my household was an IBM running MS DOS Shell, a precursor to Windows. I was ten when my family got the computer and I used Windows or DOS for the next twelve years. That is when I purchased my first computer. At that point, it seemed everyone I knew who used Windows either struggled with viruses or their computers were so slow due to antivirus software that they might as well have had viruses anyway. I decided to switch to Mac. I purchased an iBook G4 and never looked back. Two years ago, I upgraded to a MacBook and have been very happy with it. Unfortunately, I am still forced to Windows at work, and I still run into the same security issues that frustrated me back when I switched six years ago.
Windows users may be grumbling at this point, and my intention is not to argue about which operating system is better, I just want you to know where I am coming from. I teach at a school that runs only Windows. To be specific, we use various desktops running Windows XP SP2 on a Windows 2003 server. We have so many issues with viruses, computers freezing, inoperable user accounts, and more. I don't know a lot about servers and networking, but given my personal preference for Mac, I decided to look into the prospect of purchasing Macs for our school. One phone call confirmed my suspicion that it is never going to happen. The best deal Apple would give our school was about $850 per MacBook.
Macs are great; they are secure and easy to use, they come with a great deal of powerful software right out of the box, but when it comes to providing a frugal option, Apple is the worst. Sure, all of Apple's computers have high-end hardware and advocates will argue that users save in the long-run because they do not have to purchase additional security software or deal with as many IT headaches. This may be true when comparing to Windows, but Windows is not the only other option.
Fueled by my disappointing phone call to Apple and frustrated by being forced to use AT&T in order to have an iPhone (Verizon will soon be providing iPhones now), I decided it was time to finally try a Linux operating system. Linux is a kernel; you can think of it as the core of an operating system. Like MacOS, it is based on Unix, but unlike MacOS, it is completely open source. It is free, and anyone with the knowledge can build an operating system using Linux as the Kernel. In recent years, some Linux derivatives have grown very popular. Android, Google's mobile operating system used on phones and tablets, is built on Linux, and even Amazon's Kindle uses a modified Linux kernel. Desktop distributions of Linux are not as well known, but are growing in popularity and in sophistication.
When I decided to try Linux, I opted for Ubuntu, the most popular desktop distribution based on Linux. I had hoped to find something I would like more than Windows, but I assumed it would be a little limited in features. I was wrong. Despite the fact that Ubuntu is completely free, it is an advanced operating system with some features I have never seen in MacOS or Windows.
I suspect a lot of people are afraid to try a different operating system, especially if it means buying a new computer or losing your access to your trusty old OS, but there are several risk-free, easy ways to try Ubuntu for free. First of all, Ubuntu can be downloaded directly from ubuntu.com or you can order a CD for a fee. You can then use the CD to install Ubuntu on your computer or you can try Ubuntu directly from the CD without installing anything. I chose to install VirtualBox on my MacBook and install Ubuntu in a virtual machine. VirtualBox enables users to run operating systems within another operating system. It is open source, so it is free as well, but there are other proprietary options such as Parallels and VMware if you feel like spending money. You can use any of these to run several different operating systems much in the same way you would run any program on your computer. It is more difficult to use this option, and I also noticed some loss of functionality, but it is still an excellent way to become familiar with another operating system. I may post more about this later.
After using Ubuntu in Vbox for about a month, I decided it was time to run it natively. I still wanted my Mac and I was not interested in dual booting so I decided to purchase a little netbook from System76, a Colorado company that makes computers and sells them with Ubuntu installed. The computer cost less than $400 but there are less expensive options. I could have purchased a used computer and installed Ubuntu, but I also wanted to test feasibility of using netbooks with students at my school.
Ubuntu Software Center
The first two weeks I had my netbook, I would bring it and my MacBook to work. Now, I hardly even use my MacBook. Don't get me wrong, I still like MacOS, but I hate the Apple philosophy. All of Apple's computers are high-end and expensive, and you can only legally run MacOS on a Macintosh computer so you have to purchase from them. I can run Ubuntu or any other Linux "distro" on any computer (as long as the hardware supports it and most do) and I do not even have to pay for the operating system. Ubuntu also comes with the Ubuntu Software Center which includes almost 35,000 FREE applications (think of Android Market or Macs App store).
As I use Ubuntu more, I am learning just how feature-rich this operating system really is. As a Mac-user, I loved being able to use expose to switch between windows and workspaces. I grew especially dependent on my hot-corners. Well, much to my excitement, not only can I still use hot-corners and expose in Ubuntu, but there are even more window and workspace switching features, such as the desktop cube. Also, unlike MacOS, Ubuntu is highly customizable. I do not have to have my computer look and operate the way Steve Jobs thinks I should; I can set it up my own way.
Switching Workspaces uses Desktop Cube in Ubuntu
Next week, I am going to blog about some of my favorite Ubuntu features and explain why I believe educators especially should try Linux.
When I first heard about Diigo and Delicious, I didn't understand why people would want to share their bookmarks with anyone else. Even though I was aware of several Web 2.0 tools, I was still stuck in the Web 1.0 mentality, where the Internet was still primarily a place one goes to find information. I had always used bookmarks as shortcuts to my most commonly visited sites. It never occurred to me that bookmarking could be a social activity.
I started using Diigo a couple of months ago even though I was not that impressed with it. I was expecting it to replace browser-based bookmarks, and it could, but the real power in Diigo or any other social bookmarking site is the ability it gives users to share ideas and interests. I am just beginning to explore the collaborative features of Diigo. I have started joining groups to learn what others are bookmarking. This is an excellent way to discover information about topics of interest. I have not started following individuals yet but I can see how that might be very useful as well.
Besides discovering and sharing information with strangers, it is also easy to collaborate with classmates or colleagues using Diigo. I recently signed-up for an educator account with Diigo. I am going to create student subaccounts for one of my classes next semester in order to help my student work together in group research projects. I am still debating whether I should do this with Diigo or Google Bookmarks. I like Diigo better but the nice thing about Google Bookmarks is... well, it's Google.
I have heard people complain about Google taking over the world, and I do think it is important not to rely too heavily on one entity, but as an educator, it is really nice to have one central location for several services. I create one Google account for each student and that account will give him access to scores of Web 2.0 tools. I am trying to get approval from my principal to set-up Google Apps for our school.
Google Reader is by far the most distracting web tool. It provides instant access to incoming feeds from any site of interest. Because the user subscribes to changes on the website, there is no need to navigate to the same website repeatedly to find out what is new, and it's harder to miss something. I set Google Reader up in my Google Gadgets, which appear on my desktop. This means that not only do I not need to surf webpages to find something interesting, but I don't even need to open a web browser to view my RSS feeds. There are several distracting new bits of information for me to read, right on my desktop. It's extraordinary and truly is a wonderful way to stay informed.
